I'm reading about a Word "clone", apparently made by the same people who recreated "clones" of Adobe's software suite.
I don't know how legal any of this is, and I'm not going to get into that. But I can't help smiling at the reactions.
When they started pushing AI, they told us we would lose our jobs, whether we liked it or not. That AI would replace us, whether we liked it or not.
Now that someone has decided to apply the very same principle to their products, suddenly they don't like it anymore.
"You can create new games, but you can't recreate existing ones."
Hurts, doesn't it?
And that's the point. The problem isn't the technology itself, but the way certain sharks use it at other people's expense. When they're the ones on the receiving end, and only then, ethics suddenly becomes a concern again.
Ch M[ae][iy]e?r 🇪🇺 🤍 🇬🇱
Als Antwort auf Maik • • •"Können" und "in Eigenverantwortung der Schulen".
Interessant ist auch, dass es z.B. in RLP schon das Bildungsportal und den Schulcampus gibt, das von Moodle, ONLY-Office, EduSharing-Cloud … bis hin zu Messenger (auf Matrix-Basis) schon allerlei sinnvolle Dinge auf OpenSource-Basis selbst betreibt.
Davon abgesehen gibt es auch genug Schulen lieber die an den "Marktführern" (mit iPads, iCloud, MS365, OneDrive, …) festhalten. 🤷♂️
Da scheint mir ein Rahmenvertrag mit einer Laufzeit von 4 Jahren … naja … schwer greifbar.
Maik
Als Antwort auf Ch M[ae][iy]e?r 🇪🇺 🤍 🇬🇱 • • •